From June 19-21 this year, Atlanta celebrates Juneteenth with a parade and music festival. Yet, most of what Americans, regardless of race, think they know about this holiday is false.

Union Gen. Gordon Granger was not in Galveston, Texas, on June 19, 1865, to tell poor, uninformed Black people they were free. The Emancipation Proclamation did not free all enslaved men and women. And during the time of the first Juneteenth, the federal government, under President Andrew Johnson, was actively stripping away reparations for slavery.

Felix Haywood, a formerly enslaved man, was 20 years old and present for the first Juneteenth. At 92 years old and blind, he was interviewed by U.S. Works Progress Administration writer Fred Dibble in 1937.

Here’s how Dibble transcribed this quote from Haywood: “The war (Civil War) weren’t so great as folks suppose. It was the ending of it that made the difference. That’s when we all wakes up that somethin’ had happened. Oh, we knowed what was goin’ on in it all the time. ... We had papers in them days jus’ like now.”

If the enslaved knew what was going on, then why was Gen. Granger in Galveston?

What Lincoln meant to do through the Emancipation Proclamation

Clyde W. Ford is a historian and author. (Courtesy)

Credit: Handout

icon to expand image

Credit: Handout

White settlers in Texas, formerly Coahuila y Tejas, the most northern state of Mexico, fought a war of independence from Mexico (“Remember the Alamo”) so that Texas could enter the United States as a slave state in 1845. During the run-up to the Civil War, and during the war, white slaveholders throughout the South marched enslaved men and women to Texas, believing that whatever the outcome of the war, Texas would never submit to Union rule. Thus, after the war, they could return to Texas to reclaim their property and their Southern way of life.

Gen. Granger was in Galveston with 2,000 troops to back him up, to deliver a warning to white slaveowners that they needed to cease and desist holding and brutalizing enslaved people.

In issuing Special Orders No. 3, Granger stated that the Emancipation Proclamation freed “all slaves.” But that was patently untrue. Even the most cursory reading of the Emancipation Proclamation shows that Lincoln issued it to free enslaved men and women in the Confederate states only.

So, after the Emancipation went into effect, you could not hold slaves in Mississippi, but you could in Massachusetts. Or, as the London Spectator noted, “the principle asserted is not that a human being cannot justly own another but that he cannot own him unless he is loyal to the United States.”

Lincoln did not have the interests of the enslaved at heart. The Emancipation Proclamation was a “psy-ops” (psychological operations) document for winning the Civil War, and Lincoln admitted as such. Unsurprisingly, he had no plan for what to do with the millions freed by his proclamation. That task fell to Union Gen. William “Tecumseh” Sherman, who devised a plan, in consultation with southern Black ministers. Sherman’s plan became known as “40 acres and a mule,” was actually entitled, “Special Field Orders No. 15.” It took nearly 1 million acres of prime agricultural land along the southeast coast of the U.S. from slaveholders and granted that land to the men and women they’d enslaved.

Gigi Chism, 4, waves flags from a car during the Juneteenth parade in College Park on Thursday, June 19, 2025. (Arvin Temkar/AJC)

Credit: arvin.temkar@ajc.com

icon to expand image

Credit: arvin.temkar@ajc.com

Reversing course on ‘40 acres and a mule’ had lasting implications

By the time of Lincoln’s assassination in April 1865, some 40,000 Black families had received these land grants. But within months of Andrew Johnson assuming the presidency after Lincoln’s assassination, in fact, right around the time of the first Juneteenth, Johnson issued orders to return the land to the former slaveholders.

Had that land stayed in the hands of the formerly enslaved there would be no present-day “wealth gap” between Blacks and whites Americans, no political “power gap” and no need for reparations because that land grant was specifically a Republican Congress’ act of reparations for slavery.

So, what’s the basis for celebrating Juneteenth? Telling Black folks they were free when they already knew that? Telling white folks to stop killing and enslaving Black folks? Acknowledging an end to slavery when the document supposedly ending slavery did no such thing? Recognizing a time in American history when reparations for slavery were granted, then summarily stripped away?

I related this story to a Black woman who’d been deeply involved in securing Juneteenth as a national holiday. She touched my arm before I could finish and whispered, “Think I’ve heard enough.”

“But don’t you want to know the truth?” I asked.

She shook her head. “Not really. We got the holiday. That’s enough for me!”

Well, it’s not enough for me!


Clyde W. Ford is a historian, whose books include “A High Price for Freedom: Raising Hidden Voices from the African American Past” (HarperCollins Publishers, 2026) and “Of Blood and Sweat: Black Lives and the Making of White Power and Wealth” (HarperCollins Publishers, 2023).

About the Author

Keep Reading

FILE - Drummers form a circle around Sika Dwimfo, better known as the, "Godfather of Leimert Park," during the neighborhood's Juneteenth celebration, June 19, 2024, at Leimert Park in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)

Credit: AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes

Featured

Protesters rally against Atlanta’s Public Safety Training Center at a Midtown construction site. Three people accused of trying to set fire to the Cobb office of Brasfield & Gorrie had their charges dismissed Wednesday. (John Spink/AJC 2024)

Credit: John Spink